Current:Home > ContactNYC will pay $17.5M to settle lawsuit alleging women were forced to remove hijabs in mugshots -Edge Finance Strategies
NYC will pay $17.5M to settle lawsuit alleging women were forced to remove hijabs in mugshots
View
Date:2025-04-14 14:53:54
NEW YORK – The city agreed Friday to pay $17.5 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleged police officers forced two women to remove hijabs while mugshot photos were being taken, lawyers for the women said Friday.
The case, filed in 2018, stemmed from the arrests of Muslim American women Jamilla Clark and Arwa Aziz. In court records, they alleged New York City Police officers threatened them to remove their headscarves, and the two felt ashamed after being forced to do so.
New York City:NYPD officer shot, killed during traffic stop in Queens by suspect with prior arrests
“When they forced me to take off my hijab, I felt as if I were naked,” Clark said in a statement released by her lawyers and advocates. “I’m not sure if words can capture how exposed and violated I felt.”
The settlement announced Friday still requires approval by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in federal court in New York.
Clark and Aziz’s attorney, O. Andrew F. Wilson, said forcing someone to remove religious clothing is akin to a strip search. The women alleged the removal of their hijabs for booking photographs violated their First Amendment rights, as well as federal religious protections and state law.
“This is a milestone for New Yorkers’ privacy and religious rights,”said Albert Fox Cahn, executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, a civil rights group that provided legal representation for the plaintiffs. “The NYPD should never have stripped these religious New Yorkers of their head coverings and dignity. This wasn’t just an assault on their rights, but on everything our city claims to believe in."
In 2020, the New York City Police Department changed its policy as a response to the lawsuit, allowing people to be photographed with religious garb as long as their faces weren’t covered, the New York Times reported. Advocates supporting the lawsuit said the NYPD has practiced a policy of keeping mugshots as part of its facial recognition surveillance program.
The agreement maintains the city denied engaging in a pattern or process that deprived people of their protected rights, court records said. The city didn’t admit to the specific claims made by Clark and Aziz.
Nick Paolucci, a spokesperson for the New York City Law Department, said the resolution was in the best interest of all parties.
“This settlement resulted in a positive reform for the NYPD,” he said in a statement. “The agreement carefully balances the department’s respect for firmly held religious beliefs with the important law enforcement need to take arrest photos.”
Criminal justice:New York City police have to track the race of people they stop. Will others follow suit?
Clark and Aziz both wore hijabs in line with their Muslim faith, which covers a woman’s hair, ears and neck, but leaves her face exposed. Many observant Muslim women wear it at all times when they’re in the presence of men who aren’t part of their immediate family.
In January 2017, Clark said she wept with her hijab down around her shoulders at NYPD headquarters in Manhattan, and begged to put it back on, court records said. She said she had been arrested for violating an order of protection by her ex-husband, which she said was false.
Eight months later, in August, Aziz had her photo taken with her hijab at her neck, in a Brooklyn precinct after voluntarily turning herself over to NYPD for violating a protective order against her sister-in-law that she said she didn’t commit. She, too, cried during the photos that had to be taken in front of several male NYPD officers and over 30 men incarcerated, according to court records.
As part of the agreement, the city prepared a class list of people who had their religious head covering removed for an official NYPD photo, according to court records. Attorneys estimate the proposed settlement could make over 3,600 people eligible for payments between approximately $7,000 and $13,000. They encouraged anyone who had their head coverings removed for a mugshot between March 16, 2014 and Aug. 23, 2021 to also file.
“We send our appreciation to the Muslim women who bravely persisted with this litigation, prompting policy change that benefit many with similar religious garb requirements,” Afar Nasher, executive director of the civil rights group Council on American-Islamic Relations New York chapter, said in a statement.
Notices of the settlement would go out to people identified in police records. Information would be available in English and also in Arabic, Bengali, Spanish, Urdu and Hebrew.
veryGood! (9188)
Related
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Texas man dies after collapsing during Grand Canyon hike
- Woman dies from being pushed into San Francisco-area commuter train
- Former Moelis banker seen punching woman is arrested on assault charges
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Hallmark's Shantel VanSanten and Victor Webster May Have the Oddest Divorce Settlement Yet
- Attorneys face deadline to wrap Jan. 6 prosecutions. That could slide if Trump wins
- Angela Simmons apologizes for controversial gun-shaped purse at BET Awards: 'I don't mean no harm'
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Jamie Foxx gives new details about mysterious 2023 medical emergency
Ranking
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Dutch king swears in a new government 7 months after far-right party won elections
- José Raúl Mulino sworn in as Panama’s new president, promises to stop migration through Darien Gap
- Joseph Quinn still cringes over his 'stupid' interaction with Taylor Swift
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- GOP US Rep. Spartz, of Indiana, charged with bringing gun through airport security, officials say
- Man accused of stabbing Salman Rushdie rejects plea deal involving terrorism charge
- Long time coming. Oklahoma's move to the SEC was 10 years in the making
Recommendation
The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
House Republicans sue Attorney General Merrick Garland, seeking Biden audio
62-year-old woman arrested in death of Maylashia Hogg, a South Carolina teen mother-to-be
In New York’s Finger Lakes Region, Long-Haul Garbage Trucks Trigger Town Resolutions Against Landfill Expansion
McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
Ann Wilson announces cancer diagnosis, postpones Heart tour
USA TODAY Editor-in-Chief Terence Samuel leaves Gannett after one year
Man accused of stabbing Salman Rushdie rejects plea deal involving terrorism charge